Sunday, December 10, 2006

conquest of a different kind


....Within a century of Clive's victory at Plassey(1757), practically the whole of India had come under the control of the East India Company. It would however be wrong to imagen that the British on their own conquered India.

Man to man, a British soldier was no match to an Indian soldier.....Whenever the British won a battle, it was always a battle in which the section of the Indian army went over to the side of the British and fought against their own countrymen.

Those who directed the conquest were mere merchants of a trading corporation who had no experience of wars and warlike operations. Many of their commanders were men from the clerical establishment who either volunteered or were pitchforked into soldering.

The conquest was peculiar in yet another sense. It was achieved wholly at the expense of the conquered, for the company did not contribute a penny towards the expense of the war and conquest. It was peculiar also because the instruments of the conquest were provided by the conquered.....

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Read in school history about this...
No idea what you trying to say though....

zzz-writer said...

i am not trying to say anything. this means something to me thus wrote it here. it could mean hundred different things to different people. this is its only purpose.

Anonymous said...

Well, I only wanted to understand the topic....

Anonymous said...

And I understood now!

sorry If I've sounded bit naive in my first comment!

zzz-writer said...

now you got me wondering if i said anything to make you feel like that. did i?
anyways, glad you found a meaning of your own :)

Anonymous said...

No...you didn't. Just that I made first comment in a rush and in bit of retaliation (since it made me think to understand) this morning.

Thanks for the wishes!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
zzz-writer said...

:)